THE BLOG

04
Feb

Tribe Owned Businesses in Downtown USA?

So… U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote a letter January 28, 2013 to The Federal Bureau of Indian Affairs asking the agency to reject the Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma’s land-into-trust application. The Oklahoma-based tribe bought 229 acres of vacant land in Cayuga County, NY for $738,554 in 2002. The Bureau rejected their plans for a casino in 2006 and 2008. The agency said, “the tribe had not demonstrated the casino plan would provide an economic benefit to the tribe’s members in Oklahoma.” Strange…

What’s the implication for other tribally owned businesses? What if this “geographically remote,” federally recognized  tribe were to build a call center in downtown NY coupled with a technology center to offer small dollar loans exceeding New York’s usury rates? Certainly this enterprise would employ both tribe and local residents thus benefiting both parties economically. How will local tax payers, officials and state attorney’s general respond as this scenario is repeated in cities throughout the USA?

According to Glenn Coin | gcoin@syracuse.com , if the trust application is approved this time, the land will be taken off the tax rolls, costing local taxing entities approximately $9,541 in revenues, based on 2012 real property records. What about the jobs that would be created for employees of the call center and all the construction and materials employment resulting from this construction? Any thought given to the impact on local businesses from restaurants to equipment suppliers?

Read more here and here.

01
Feb

Payday Loans: “SAFE Lending Act”

Time to rally the troops and support your trade group? (FISCA, CFSA, OLA, NAFSA, and your state association) Good for “brick-n-mortar operators? Will your valuations increase? Would this force borrowers to abandon online lenders,  jump-into their automobiles and drive to a payday loan store? It’s no wonder so many payday loan lead generators are exploring direct lending via the tribe model. Google has been leaning hard on them. Now the FED’s are eyeballing them! More on all this later. Here’s the meat.

January 29, 2013: Senators Introduce Bill Attacking Online Payday Loans

The SAFE Lending Act has four main provisions:

  • Ensures That Consumers have Control of their own Bank Accounts
  • Ensures that a third party doesn’t gain control of a consumer’s account through remotely created checks (RCCs), which are checks from a consumer’s bank account created by third parties. To prevent unauthorized RCCs, consumers will be able to preauthorize exactly who can create an RCC on his/her behalf (such as when traveling).
  • Allows consumers to cancel a debit (just like they can cancel a check) in connection with a small-dollar (payday) loan. This would prevent an Internet payday lender from stripping a checking account without a consumer being able to stop it.
  • Closes Loopholes and Creates a Level Playing Field In State Usury Law Enforcement
  • Requires all lenders, including banks, to abide by state rules for the small-dollar, payday-like loans they may offer customers in a state. Only states, not the federal government, have laws to prevent 400% APR loans.
  • Bans Lead Generators and Anonymous Payday Lending.Some websites describe themselves as payday lenders but are actually “lead generators” that collect applications and auction them to payday lenders and others. This practice is rife with abuse and has even led to fraudulent debt collection.
  • Stops Offshore and Other Illegal Online Payday Lending in Violation of State Law
  • Gives the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau authority on its own behalf and upon petition by state Attorneys General or other local regulators to shut down payment processing for lenders that are violating State and other consumer lending laws through the Internet.
    Carefully constructed not to negatively impact the Internet.

Oregon’s Senator Jeff Merkley, Senator Tom Udall (D-NM), Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced the Stopping Abuse and Fraud in Electronic (SAFE) Lending Act. The SAFE Lending Act would crack down on the worst practices of the online payday lending industry and give states more power to protect consumers from predatory loans.

“We threw the payday lenders, who prey on families when they’re at their most vulnerable, out of Oregon back in 2007,” said Merkley. “Technology has taken a lot of these scams online, and it’s time to crack down. Families deserve a fair shake when they’re looking to borrow money, not predatory loans that trap them in a vortex of debt.”

“Too often, families who turn to payday lending fall victim to deceitful practices that make it harder for them to make ends meet. With payday lending moving online, the opportunities for abuse are growing,” said Udall. “We owe it to those who earn an honest paycheck to ensure they are protected online just as they are in many of our states, like New Mexico.”

“Even as our economy begins to show signs of recovery, many hardworking families are still struggling to make ends meet,” said Durbin. “Unfortunately, many of these families are the targets of lenders offering payday loans with outrageous, often hidden interest rates that can have crippling effects on those who can afford it least. This bill will protect consumers and law-abiding lenders and I hope we can move it quickly on the floor.”

“The abusive and arbitrary practices of online payday lenders need to be stopped,” said Blumenthal. “Too often these lenders saddle vulnerable families with debt – creating a vicious cycle that makes them more vulnerable. This bill will protect consumers from this predatory industry.”

The legislation is endorsed by Americans for Financial Reform, Center for Responsible Lending, and the Consumer Federation of America.

31
Jan

$500K grossing store in Las Vegas for sale! PDL, Car Title, Check Cashing…

Ever wanted to own a store in Paradise? Want a tax write-off for those Las Vegas business trips? Now is your chance!
$500K grossing store in Las Vegas for sale!

  • Check Cashing
  • Title Loans
  • Payday Loan ready (licensed but not doing now)
  • Gold/silver/diamond buyer
  • Money gram wire/money orders
  • Bill Pay
  • Debit Cards
  • Gift Card buys
  • ATM via pin pad
  • Phone cards
  • Comes with Dancing Girls! (Not really :o)

Located minutes from the famous Las Vegas Strip, this location sits right off Sahara Ave with approx 80,000 cars per day. The $8,000 digital sign installed 2 years ago lights up the street.

Training to perform all the above services by one of the best, most experienced players in our industry included!

The land lord is easy to work with and flexible. The store has been in business 25 years and is fully built-out with 4 windows and software, safe, etc. Store also has seasoned staff begging to remain.

Asking .75% of gross 50% down 50% 12 months 5% APR. Take off 10% for cash deal.

Owner wants to travel the world with showgirls…. This one won’t last!

For financials and additional info:
Email: LVStore@PaydayLoanIndustry.com (Include your contact info!)
No… don’t call Jer. Shoot an email to contact the seller.

30
Jan

Debt Buying and Collections: 2013 FTC Study Released

The FTC just concluded a 2013 study focused on the debt buying industry. If you’re interested, read on. If not, I suggest you blow “outta here now.”

By Jer Ayles-Ayler: A portion of the key findings and executive summary. (We’ve provided a direct link to the entire FTC PDF at the bottom of this POST.)

PRICES BUYERS PAID FOR PURCHASED DEBT

Buyers paid an average of 4.0 cents per dollar of debt face value.  Analysis of the prices debt buyers paid for debt purchased in more than 3,400 portfolios showed that the average price was 4.0 cents per dollar of debt face value.  Older debt sold for a significantly lower price than newer debt.  The price of debt older than 15 years was virtually zero.  Buyers paid similar prices for debt purchased from original creditors and resellers…

INFORMATION THAT DEBT BUYERS RECEIVED

Buyers typically received the information required for validation notices.  Buyers were likely to have received from sellers the information that the FDCPA currently requires that debt collectors include with validation notices at the beginning of the collection process, including the amount of the debt.  They also either received or were likely aware of the name of the original creditor, which the FDCPA requires that they provide to consumers upon written request.

Buyers also typically received additional information that could make validation notices more useful, but they usually did not provide it to consumers.  Buyers also typically received additional information that, if disclosed to consumers, might help consumers assess whether they are the correct debtor and whether the amount of the debt is correct.  This information included the name of the original creditor, the original creditor’s account number, the debtor’s social security number, the date of last payment, and the date of charge-off.

Buyers rarely received dispute history.  Buyers rarely received any information from sellers concerning whether a consumer had disputed the debt or whether the disputed debt had been verified…

ACCOUNT DOCUMENTATION THAT DEBT BUYERS RECEIVED

Buyers received few underlying documents about debts.  Although buyers received the data file and some other information about the debts, as discussed above, they obtained very few documents related to the purchased debts at the time of sale or after purchase.  For most portfolios, buyers did not receive any documents at the time of purchase.  Only a small percentage of portfolios included documents, such as account statements or the terms and conditions of credit.

WARRANTIES AS TO INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION THAT DEBT BUYERS RECEIVED

Accuracy of information provided about debts at time of sale not guaranteed.  In purchase and sale agreements obtained in the study, sellers generally disclaimed all representations and warranties with regard to the accuracy of the information they provided at the time of sale about individual debts – essentially selling debts, with some limited exceptions, “as is.”  The fact…

DEBT BUYERS’ ABILITY TO OBTAIN ACCOUNT DOCUMENTATION

Limitations were placed on debt buyer access to account documents.  Buyers were given a defined amount of time (e.g., typically between six months and three years) to request up to a specified maximum number of documents (e.g., equal to 10% to 25% of the number of debts in the portfolio) at no charge.  After that, buyers were given an additional, defined amount of time to request documents for a fee, usually between $5 and $10 per document, with a maximum number of documents again specified.  Debt sellers usually had substantial time, typically between 30 and 60 days, to respond to requests for documents.  Availability of documents not guaranteed.  Most purchase and sale agreements stated that documents may not be available for all accounts.

Additional limitations applied to the resale of purchased debt.  If debt buyers resold debt to secondary buyers, the original creditors typically had no obligation to provide documents directly to the secondary buyers; instead the secondary buyers were required to forward document requests through the original buyers, which sometimes added additional fees and delays.

CONSUMER DISPUTES OF DEBTS

Consumers disputed 3.2% of debts that buyers attempted to collect themselves.  The data…

VERIFICATION OF DISPUTED DEBTS

About half of disputed debts were reported as verified.  Buyers reported that they had verified 51.3% of the debts consumers disputed.  Older debt…

DEBT AGE AND STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

Some debt was beyond the statute of limitations, though most was not.  Many states have statute of limitations barring lawsuits to collect on a debt after a certain period, typically between three and six years…

http://ftc.gov/os/2013/01/debtbuyingreport.pdf

28
Jan

Payday Loan Companies Hijacking Web Sites

Jer Trihouse Payday Loan Industry ResourcesBy Jer Ayles-Ayler

Payday loan brokers are hacking into unrelated websites to divert their history and status to the payday loan lead generators’ domain. Web site hijacking improves the PDL lead generators ranking on Google leading to millions in profits for the lead brokers.

These findings come as the Office of Fair Trading (OFT-UK)) prepares a report on the “dirty tricks in the payday loan market,” due to be published in February, 2013.

Sky News writes, “Google’s natural listings system can be tricked. Sky News found three payday websites that were stealing the credibility of other websites to boost their ranking. The target victim sites included a music business, a graduate website and even a church website.”

Read the entire piece written by Jason Farrell, Sky Correspondent:
“Payday Loan Sites’ Dirty Tricks To Boost Traffic”
http://news.sky.com/story/1043410/payday-loan-sites-dirty-tricks-to-boost-traffic

Email Jer: Jer@PaydayManual.com  PDL Resources:  http://www.PaydayManual.com