THE BLOG

02
Aug

More Heat on Western Sky Payday Loan Lender by Michigan

Webb told The Argus Leader in Sioux Falls last year that his company, Western Sky, is honest and that it doesn’t have to abide by state laws because he’s a tribal member operating on a reservation.

Western Sky is not licensed in Michigan and has charged interest rates of more than 340 percent. Michigan’s maximum rate is 7 percent or 25 percent; depending on the type of lender. DIFS said Western Sky also charges fees up to 70 percent of the loan amount — 14 times the legal limit.

The Michigan Department of Financial Institutions suggests that a borrower of $2,600 from Western Sky could pay more than $14,000 in principal and interest over the life of the loan.

“DIFS advises consumers to only conduct business with entities that are properly licensed,” Director Kevin Clinton said in a statement. “Through our investigation, it became clear this company is not complying with state laws that were put in place to protect consumers and is taking advantage of Michigan residents.”

Oregon, Colorado and Washington have issued complaints or fines against Weastern Sky, owned by Martin Webb, a member of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.

Webb is the target of a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit that claims his companies forced customers from throughout the country to appear before a tribal court in South Dakota that didn’t have jurisdiction over the cases.

01
Aug

ZestFinance – Payday Loan Big Data Provider – Received $20 Million from PayPal’s Peter Thiel

By Jer Trihouse. Sarah McBride WITH Reuters wrote an interesting piece on ZestFinance today. Zest received $20million from PayPal’s Peter Thiel.

We’ve previously alerted you here at PaydayLoanIndustryBlog about the pivot ZestFinance made from direct lending to licensing its “Big Data” technology to Lenders.

ZestFinance CEO Douglas Merrill says, “Their underwriting technology implemented in the small dollar loan space enables Spotloan – owned by the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians in Belcourt, North Dakota – to charge 50% of the rates charged borrowers by traditional payday loan lenders.”

The ZestFinance team has some heavy-hitters. Theil was with Paypal. COO shawn Budde was with Capital One. So far, they’ve raised $55 million.\
Like these daily Posts? Grab a subscription to our Blog updates over there > Top Right of this page. “Enter your email address for future Posts:”

Improve your payday loan operation. Get the NEW “Powerhouse Course available at PaydayLoanUniversity.com

31
Jul

Payday Loan Tribe Trends

If you’re a “brick-n-mortar” operator, or an Internet  Lender using the state-by-state licensing model, the following may not be of interest to you initially. BUT, think about this development from a competitive perspective.

The macro trend for Internet payday loan – small dollar – lenders employing the sovereign model is to embrace “best practices” and seek out industry trade group accreditation. What’s this mean? Here’s an example:

“About American Web Loan: American Web Loan is a tribal lending company that is wholly owned by the Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians and its members, a sovereign nation located within the United States of America.  AWL is dedicated to providing short-term financial solutions to Americans in need. Since its formation in 2010, American Web Loan has built a nationwide reputation for spearheading the industry’s most innovative financial products backed by a singular commitment to client service excellence. The company combines an unparalleled team of experienced and dedicated financial professionals with state-of-the-art online technologies to successfully meet emergency financial needs. In addition to its sought-after portfolio of loan choices, American Web Loan offers comprehensive customer loyalty and financial education programs expressly designed to help solve money challenges in the short-term and improve clients’ lives in the long-term. American Web Loan is a member of The Native American Financial Services Association (NAFSA) and the Online Lenders Alliance (OLA). Established in 2012, NAFSA advocates for Native American sovereign rights and enables tribes to offer responsible online lending products.

(Note: Best practices definition for payday loans? It’s in the eye of the beholder, and the Feds, and the state your borrower resides in,  and your legal counsel, and the industry trade organization you belong to, and… )

You can read the entire PR Piece here:

Like these daily Posts? Grab a subscription to our Blog updates over there > Top Right of this page. “Enter your email address for future Posts:”

30
Jul

Judge Agrees With FTC: Scammers Debited Payday Loan Applicants’ Bank Accounts Without Their Consent; Consumers…

Jer Trihouse PicFor Release: 07/30/2013
Judge Agrees With FTC: Scammers Debited Payday Loan Applicants’ Bank Accounts Without Their Consent; Consumers Entitled to More Than $9.5 Million in Refunds. A federal judge has found in favor of the Federal Trade Commission in its case against an online operation that illegally debited consumers’ bank accounts when they visited the defendants’ websites seeking payday loans. The FTC will seek a court order requiring the defendants to return more than $9.5 million to consumers.

In 2011, the FTC charged Direct Benefits Group LLC, Voice Net Global LLC, Solid Core Solutions Inc., WKMS Inc., Kyle Wood, and Mark Berry with illegally debiting consumers’ bank accounts and failing to disclose that they would use their bank account information to charge them for enrollment in unwanted programs and services. The court froze the defendants’ assets pending resolution of the case.

In a decision announced today, U.S. District Court Judge John Antoon II found that the FTC proved its case, that a permanent injunction to stop the illegal practices is warranted, and that consumers are entitled to the return of more than $9.5 million.

According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants’ websites asked for consumers’ personal and financial information, and, near the end of the loan application form, offered unrelated programs for food, travel and merchandise discounts, or for long distance calling and Internet access. Many consumers who clicked to “submit” an application were enrolled unwittingly into the programs, which initially charged their bank accounts up to $59.90 per month, and later charged up to $99.90 per year.

As alleged in the complaint, the defendants sent consumers’ bank account information to Landmark Clearing Inc. and other payment processors to electronically generate remotely created payment orders that debited consumers’ bank accounts.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 2,000 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.

Here is the Formal FTC Complaint. Interesting reading…

MEDIA CONTACT:
Frank Dorman,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2674

STAFF CONTACT:
Chris M. Couillou,
FTC’s Southeast Region
404-656-1353

Harold E. Kirtz
FTC’s Southeast Region
404-656-1357

29
Jul

Payday Loan Industry in The UK

Are you offering consumers payday loan products in the U.K.? Yes? Then read this BCCA Publication and consider signing up for future Newsletters: BCCA What’s happening in The United Kingdom is simply a preview of CFPB actions here in the U.S.

“Licence revocation
Less than two weeks after the publication of the report, the OFT announced that with effect from 19th March 2013 online paydaylender, MCO Capital Limited (‘MCO’) had its consumer creditlicence revoked and was no longer permitted to make regulatedloans to UK consumers.

In August 2012, the OFT had identified that MCO “had failed to put in place adequate identity checks for loan applicants”, It is believed that this failure by MCO led to the company being targeted by fraudsters who used details from in excess of 7,000 individuals to apply successfully for loans totalling “millions of pounds”.

The OFT also found that MCO had “engaged in unfair business practices by writing to people who it was aware may not have taken out loans, asking unequivocally for epayment. MCO ignored OFT requests to stop this practice.” In addition the OFT stated that they found that “MCO lacked the necessary skills, knowledge and experience to run a consumer credit business.”

MCO appealed the decision but on 19 March withdrew its appeal. However it would seem that MCO are continuing to appeal the OFT’s decision to impose financial penalties amounting to in excess of £500,000 for anti-money laundering breaches.

David Fisher, OFT Director of Credit, said: “Removing MCO’s licence is a timely reminder that payday and other lenders risk losing their licences if they engage in unfair business practices. The way MCO chased consumers for debts they did not owe was unacceptable and caused unnecessary distress to many people”